Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 05:34

Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Do women really cheat more than men?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Minnesota Vikings News and Links: Another Day OF OTAs! - Daily Norseman
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Apple’s new iPadOS has given my iPad a new lease of life - Creative Bloq
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Study Says If You're Over 50, Taking This Vitamin May Help You Live Longer - AOL.com
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Top Federal Reserve official promises major overhaul of US bank regulation - Financial Times
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Bruins acquire former first-round pick in trade with Blackhawks - Boston.com
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Thank you.
United-JetBlue Tie Up Leaves American Airlines Bloodied - Live and Let's Fly